Описание презентации по отдельным слайдам:
Effective strategies of argumentative discussion in writing a « pros»and «cons essay» Hypothesis: Quality of English language written and speech argumentative competence in writing «for» and «against» essay will be more effective if to solve the following problems : 1 . To prove the content of the concept "argumentative discussion". 2 . To determine criteria, characteristics and thesaurus of «for» and «against» essay. 3 . To create a universal model combining the most effective strategies for writing an essay. Goal: development, scientific justification and practical check of effectiveness of the model.
Argumentation theory 1. Development of rules of discussion. 2 . Choice of general language means. 3 . Clearness of expression of the intentions definitions 4 . Arrangement of the main terms. 5 . from reduction of a large number of arguments at once, function of each statement has to be clear. 6 . from repetition of subjects of discussion, arguments of the points of view. Critical dialog
State exam in English. General demands 1 . There is solution of a communicative task, the content of work reflects all aspects specified in a task; style registration of the speech is chosen correctly (neutral style is observed). 2 . The text of work is organized correctly, statements are logical, the structure of the text corresponds to the offered plan; means of logical communication are used correctly; the text is divided into paragraphs. 3 . The excellent knowledge of English is shown, the used vocabulary corresponded to the communicative task. 4. The correct grammar is used, grammar structures are used according to the communicative task 5 . The excellent knowledge of spelling and punctuation is shown.
Comparatetive analysis of argumentative discussion and «delayed» dialog The argumentative discussion 1 . The purpose - overcoming difference of opinions by means of rational foundation(argument). 2 . Arguments «for» have to be truthful and to be proved by o authoritative sources, available, simple and clear ; to reflect the objective reality, to correspond to common sense. 3 . Arguments « against» have to convince audience that the arguments supported by the criticized thesis, are not convincing. 4 . To strengthen arguments. The «delayed» dialogue The most important task is to convince the opponents. 2. Confirmation of the point of view by arguments, examples, data raising no doubts when reading. 3 . To make a compromise, but thus to prove that the argument of the opponent isn't rather convincing, and to disprove his point of view. 4 . To finish the essay with a quote or a rhetorical question.
The model of a «delayed» dialog To define a subject of the «delayed» dialog and to formulate it. To formulate the main theses of the «delayed» dialog and to show awareness in the question being discussed. To pick up arguments supporting the thesis. To adduce arguments in a system – to arrange them in a certain order. To disprove the opposite thesis. To strengthen arguments. To make the critical analysis based on theses. To draw a conclusion.
Номер материала: ДБ-028844
Вам будут интересны эти курсы:
|Включите уведомления прямо сейчас и мы сразу сообщим Вам о важных новостях. Не волнуйтесь, мы будем отправлять только самое главное.|