Метод 4 квадратов для
написания логичного эссе
1.
Read the essay and say what is wrong according to Criteria 1 and
2? (no paraphrase, not logical, no good argumentation or examples).
2.
Read the topic sentence and underline KEY WORDS.
3.
Think of synonyms and antonyms to the KW to paraphrase it.
4.
Decide which opinion you tend to agree with.
5.
Fold a sheet of paper into 4 and write 2 opposite opinions in the
center. Yours must be on the left.
6.
Think of 3 key words/ phrases to prove your opinion and rit them
down in the upper left corner.
7.
Add examples, arguments or reasons why you think so.
8.
Share your opinions with your partner. Listen to your partner and
give a counter argument.
S 1 listening and giving a counter argument.
S 2 listening and giving a counter argument.
9.
Write down the arguments of your partner into the upper right
corner and your counter arguments into the lower right corner.
10. Read all the arguments, choose the best ones, reread the ones
chosen and check if they sound logical.
11. Write an essay. Don’t forget about the opening supportive
sentence, the opening opposing sentence, and the opening counter argument
sentence. Be sure to use linking words.
Science is the first thing to be financed
in the modern world.
There is no doubt
that this issue is quite debatable and people differ greatly in their attitudes
towards it. Nowadays some people say it is the first thing to be financed,
others consider it less important.
I tend to agree with the
latter. Firstly, there is no doubt science is important and must be financed,
but there are more urgent problems that we already have to solve, like poverty
or ecology, for instance. We need thousands of new jobs to control poverty.
Secondly, science needs much money.
However, there are people who
think science must be the world's top priority. They say that science has made
our lives as easy as they are now compared to the lives of our ancestors
several hundred years ago, so we should keep pushing the progress to make life
even easier and more pleasant. Another reason for their propensity is that it is economically
beneficial to invest in science.
Still, I cannot agree with
those people. If most of the financial resources go into scientific research
instead of more urgent needs, soon most of the world will lie in ruins while a
small group of the richest people enjoys the results of the scientific
progress, which is not the outcome that everyone can expect.
To wrap it up, I think it is
safe to say that science is definitely not the top priority when it comes to
distribution of the world's financial resources. (239 words)
Different
ways to replace the Key Words
|
Science is the first thing to be financed=
|
The
first thing we should finance is science.
|
Science
should be financed as a matter of priority.
|
Science
is the first thing that should be financed.
|
Science
must be (the world’s) top priority.
|
Most
of the financial
resources must go into scientific research.
|
Science
is an urgent issue that needs to be funded.
|
Bank of arguments
|
Science
should be financed as a matter of priority.
|
Scientists are able to solve a lot of environmental problems
which people face nowadays, for example, global warming and high level of
pollution.
It is economically beneficial to invest in science because
scientific developments grow in popularity today.
Funding science is really useful since scientists research new
drugs and ways of treatment which will be able to help people all over the
world.
Science has made our lives as easy as they are now compared to
the lives of our ancestors several hundred years ago, so we should keep
pushing the progress to make life even easier and more pleasant.
|
Others consider it impossible to justify the amount of money spent on such
projects.
|
There are several areas
in which the money could be invested better.
There are more urgent problems that we already have means to
solve, like poverty or ecology, for instance.
Health care should be the first thing to be financed instead of
science because it is much more important in a great deal of countries in
today’s world.
Science is risky in economic terms, since the percentage of
successful projects is far from one hundred.
It took decades to make use of those discoveries and thus
improve people's lives; meanwhile most of the world's population still lives
by the old ways.
Most of the world will lie in ruins while a small group of the
richest people enjoy the results of the scientific progress, which is not the
outcome everyone except for that group.
If governments spent
less money on science, then they would be able to help solve some of these
problems such as population control, elimination of diseases like cholera,
global warming and food shortages. It seems to me that all of these issues
are more important because they affect the lives of millions of ordinary
people.
It is very costly and
provides few real benefits.
|
Essay model
|
Paragraph
1
|
There is no doubt that this issue is quite debatable and people
differ greatly in their attitudes towards it.
Some people tend to think that the first thing we should ...
Others, on the contrary, have an opposite opinion.
|
Paragraph
2
|
I tend to agree with the former ( latter) / From my point of
view, …
Firstly,
Secondly,
|
Paragraph
3
|
However, there are people who think differently. These people
consider that this allegation is untrue. One of the reasons for their
propensity is that …
|
Paragraph
4
|
I cannot agree with these people. In my opinion, …
|
Paragraph
5
|
To sum up, I believe that this issue is quite controversial and
I am able to take into account other people’s points of view. Despite that, I
do think that …
My conclusion is that
...
|
1)more
urgent problems
2)science
needs much money -
|
need thousands of new jobs to
control poverty
|
less important
|
must
be (the world’s) top priority
|
1)should
keep pushing the progress to make life easier and more pleasant
2)economically
beneficial to invest in science
|
|
1)most
of the world will lie in ruins
|
a
small group of the richest enjoys the results of the scientific progress
|
science
is not the top priority when it comes to distribution of the world's
financial resources.
|
Оставьте свой комментарий
Авторизуйтесь, чтобы задавать вопросы.